Why we tried it
Present both strengths and weaknesses of a historical scored system rather than treating one aggregate score as task capability.
What the evidence shows
The descriptive manuscript reports geometric/temporal strengths and task/motion weaknesses of a historical system; it is not a new score for the local adapter or prototype.
Where the work stands
A score profile does not establish a new method, action mechanism or unseen-task ability; local historical submission status is not a public identifier or acceptance.
Possible next steps
Use untouched task groups and paired action-divergent branches, vary adapter seeds, and bind exact model and evaluation artifacts.
Suggested next steps are untested research questions, not new experimental results. The archive records manuscript provenance, licensing and status.